Should You Ditch Twitter for Bluesky? Here is What You Need to Know

Since the presidential elections in November 2024, the reputational decline of Twitter (now X) has accelerated at an unprecedented rate. Once the town square of digital discourse, a platform that shaped political narratives and cultural movements, Twitter has instead become a case study in corporate overreach, governmental complicity, and the unintended consequences of unchecked power.

Meanwhile, Bluesky, the decentralized social media alternative backed by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, has experienced a steady rise. What started as a niche community has now evolved into a movement, attracting politicians, journalists, and artists disillusioned with Twitter’s increasingly volatile environment. To understand this shift, we need to unpack five key differences between these platforms: ownership and control, centralization vs. decentralization, moderation policies, algorithmic transparency, and accessibility.

The Problem of Ownership: A Social Media Monopoly in Conflict with Democracy

Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter in 2022 was initially celebrated by libertarian tech enthusiasts who believed his “free speech absolutism” would restore the platform’s neutrality. However, by 2024, it became clear that Musk’s ownership created a direct conflict of interest with the U.S. government’s responsibility to regulate corporations fairly.

Twitter, a company that should be subject to independent audits and ethical oversight, instead became a megaphone for its owner’s personal political leanings, financial interests, and retaliatory moderation practices. The platform’s disturbing coziness with extremist rhetoric, amplified by its financial dependence on engagement-driven controversy, created an environment where hate speech, misinformation, and corporate favoritism flourished. The Biden administration’s attempts to address regulatory concerns clashed with Musk’s growing influence, placing American leadership in an awkward position: audit and regulate Twitter fairly, or risk retaliation from a billionaire who now controlled a dominant mode of public discourse.

Centralization vs. Decentralization: Who Controls the Conversation?

The downfall of Twitter is, at its core, a case of what happens when too much power is centralized under one individual. Twitter’s policies, algorithm, and verification systems became reflections of Musk’s whims, where criticism of his ventures led to shadowbans, while sycophantic praise was rewarded with algorithmic boosts.

Bluesky, on the other hand, embraced a decentralized model where no single entity owns or controls the platform. Instead of one CEO dictating moderation policies and algorithmic behavior, Bluesky operates on the AT Protocol, which allows different servers to interact while maintaining independent rules. This decentralized approach has proven appealing to users who saw Twitter morph into a platform of arbitrary enforcement and ideological favoritism. It is no surprise that government officials, journalists, and watchdog organizations—who once relied on Twitter—have now started migrating to Bluesky, seeking a space that isn’t beholden to the financial interests of a single billionaire.

Moderation and the Unchecked Rise of Hate Speech

Under Musk’s leadership, Twitter’s moderation policies became erratic and politically motivated. High-profile accounts that spread racism, xenophobia, and hate speech were reinstated under the guise of 'free speech,' while activists and journalists were frequently suspended or throttled for exposing abuses of power. The site’s revenue model, which prioritized paid verification over authentic engagement, allowed disinformation campaigns to thrive unchecked.

Bluesky took a different approach. Instead of a one-size-fits-all moderation system, the platform allows users to choose their own content filters and moderation levels, creating an environment that fosters discussion while mitigating abuse. The result? A healthier, more balanced space where dialogue can exist without the algorithm actively promoting the most inflammatory voices.

Algorithmic Manipulation vs. Transparency

One of the major grievances with Twitter post-2024 is its opaque and manipulative algorithm. After Musk’s takeover, it became evident that the platform was no longer prioritizing organic engagement, but rather amplifying users who either paid for visibility or aligned with Musk’s own ideological interests. Reports surfaced showing right-wing propaganda accounts being artificially boosted, while investigative journalists and progressive commentators saw their reach throttled.

Bluesky, in contrast, introduced a system where users can choose their own algorithms. Instead of a platform deciding what you see, Bluesky’s model lets users and developers create different feeds with varying priorities—whether that be breaking news, artistic content, or political discussion. This level of transparency and user control has positioned Bluesky as the antithesis of Twitter’s increasingly authoritarian model.

Accessibility and the Exodus from Twitter

Twitter was once the default platform for breaking news, political discourse, and artistic engagement. But under Musk’s leadership, barriers to entry increased. The introduction of paid verification, aggressive advertising tactics, and algorithmic suppression of non-paying users made the platform feel more like a pay-to-play system than an open forum.

Bluesky, on the other hand, initially operated on an invite-only basis but has since opened to the public. While its user base is smaller, it has become a refuge for those seeking a more transparent and less exploitative online space. Former Twitter mainstays—including Barack Obama, journalists from major publications, and independent artists—have started joining Bluesky, signaling that a shift in digital discourse is underway.

The Future of Digital Discourse: Where Do We Go from Here?

The trajectory of Twitter/X and Bluesky tells a much larger story: one of corporate control vs. decentralized freedom, billionaire influence vs. community-driven governance, and profit-driven manipulation vs. transparent engagement.

As we move further into 2025, the question remains: Will Twitter collapse under the weight of its own contradictions, or will Bluesky become the new home for meaningful discourse? If the last six months are any indication, the tides are already turning.

For your convenience, main characteristics of both platforms:

Twitter (now X) and Bluesky are both social media platforms focused on short-form text posts, but they have key differences in ownership, moderation, and decentralization.

1. Ownership & Control

• Twitter/X: Owned by Elon Musk, a private company with centralized control. Policies can change rapidly based on Musk’s decisions.

• Bluesky: Founded by former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, but runs independently with a decentralized approach.

2. Centralization vs. Decentralization

• Twitter/X: Completely centralized. One company controls everything—rules, algorithms, and user bans.

• Bluesky: Uses the AT Protocol, allowing users to choose their own moderation rules, algorithms, and even host their own servers (similar to Mastodon).

3. Moderation & Free Speech

• Twitter/X: Has loosened content moderation under Musk but still bans certain content. Verified users (who pay for Twitter Blue) are prioritized in visibility.

• Bluesky: Community-driven moderation, more transparency, and multiple moderation layers so users can filter their own experiences.

4. Algorithm & Discoverability

• Twitter/X: Algorithm-controlled feed, boosting paid users and engagement-driven content.

• Bluesky: Users can choose custom algorithms for how they see content, reducing manipulation.

5. Accessibility & User Base

• Twitter/X: Open to everyone, with a massive user base (but declining credibility).

• Bluesky: Initially invite-only but now open to the public. Smaller but growing community, with many ex-Twitter users (including journalists, politicians, and artists).

TL;DR: The Main Difference?

Twitter/X = Centralized, Musk-controlled, algorithm-driven, ad-focused.
Bluesky = Decentralized, community-driven, customizable, anti-corporate Twitter alternative.

Would you consider switching, or are you just observing the chaos?

Peter Hauerland

www.vonhauerland.com

Explore my science fiction-inspired sculptures and creations here:

Galactic Fossils

Interactive Cosmos Sculptures

Art Decor Inspired by Space Objects made of sheet steel

Tiny Space Creatures